The project will serve the Northeast where the population is quite poor. The semiarid region experiences extreme water shortages and is known as the "drought polygon." The average amount of water available in the area averages 450 cubic meters per capital per year, one third of the minimum recommended by the United Nations. The Sao Francisco project will use 713 km of canals, aqueducts, tunnels, and dams to divert water from the Sao Francisco River into rivers that dry out during the dry season in order to supply people in the Northeast with water year-round.
The Sao Francisco River Basin |
In addition, the construction of new canals, dams, and more will affect plants and animals severely. Further deforestation has already been seen to desertify the already semiarid region. Channels will increase the paths of migrating animals, leading to inbreeding. And increased fish populations from the Sao Francisco diversions, especially predator fish, will disturb the balance of aquatic life in the receiving rivers.
A new canal near Fortaleza in northern Brazil |
Some argue that a more sustainable solution is increased rainwater harvesting in the Northeast. They say that the River Integration Project will increase large-scale irrigation, which will increase evapotranspiration and, as a result, salt levels in soil. A network of nearly 1,000 NGOs, labor unions, and community and religious organizations are working on increasing the number of water and irrigation tanks in the more rural parts of the region. The River Integration Project, on the other hand, serves mostly urban populations.
Despite critiques, the project moves forward. ARCADIS Logos was just awarded management of an extension of the project this month and will receive $35 million USD for building additional infrastructure over the next 33 months. The debates around this project will continue, and it will be interesting to observe whether the ecological impacts play out in the way dissenters predict now.
- Morgan
Sources:
- "ARCADIS wins extension of the largest water infrastructure project in Brazil." ARCADIS Press Release, 10 Feb 2014. http://hugin.info/132839/R/1760043/595520.pdf
- "Brazil: Costly Water for the Poor Northeast." Inter Press Service, 21 Oct 2011. http://www.ipsnews.net/2011/10/brazil-costly-water-for-the-poor-northeast/
I like how you presented both sides of the argument, for and against the Sao Francisco River Integration Project. I think that really goes to show that issues that seem to have no drawbacks or side effects actually do, and that we need to be careful in considering them before deciding to execute large-scale projects like this.
ReplyDelete-Gwynn Lyons